Showing posts with label Astrophysics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Astrophysics. Show all posts

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Shrinking Betelgeuse

This is news I can't let uncommented, after all my recent posts about interferometry: In a recent Astrophysical Journal Letter, a team of astronomers lead by Charles H. Townes, Nobel laureate for his contribution to the development of the laser, report "A Systematic Change with Time in the Size of Betelgeuse".

Betelgeuse, or α Orionis, is the bright red star in the shoulder of the constellation Orion. In 1921, Albert Michelson and Francis Pease succeeded in measuring its diameter as about 50 milliarcseconds (mas), using an interferometer mounted onto the main telescope of Mount Wilson observatory. This was the first time the diameter of a star could be measured. 50 milliarcseconds is a tiny angle, corresponding roughly to the apparent size of an object 100 metres big on the Moon. But given the distance to Betelgeuse, this means the star, when put in the place of the Sun, would fill the solar system up to the orbit of Jupiter.

In the meantime, Betelgeuse could be resolved directly using the Hubble space telescope, and its distance measured to be 200 parsecs (650 light years), though there remains an uncertainty of about 25 percent. And it has been the object of many interferometric studies.

But given the diffuseness of the outer limits of this Red Supergiant star, which on average has a density less than 1/10000 the density of air, measurements of its diameter depend on the wavelength of observation, as the thin outer atmosphere has different transparency for different wavelengths. Here is a comparison of the shape of Betelgeuse, as reconstructed from interferometric measurements taken within two weeks at three different wavelengths in the infrared:

Source: Surface imaging of Betelgeuse with the Cambridge Optical Aperture Synthesis Telescope (COAST) and the William Herschel Telescope (WHT).

The two images on the right were reconstructed using data from the Cambridge Optical Aperture Synthesis Telescope (COAST), and the image on the left with data from the William Herschel Telescope (WHT). Each image has a side length corresponding to 100 mas, and one sees big differences in the diameter of the star, and of its surface features, depending of the wavelength at which it is observed.

This fact makes it difficult to compare directly angular diameters of Betelgeuse obtained with different instruments at different wavelengths. Now, the letter of Charles Townes' team reports on data collected with one instrument at one wavelength over the last 15 years. Using the Infrared Spatial Interferometer (ISI) on Mount Wilson, not far from where Michelson and Pease did their pioneering work, they observe at a wavelength of around 11000 nanometres, and write:

The diameters measured by the ISI are not particularly inconsistent with previous measurements, are rather accurate, and show clearly that the star has systematically decreased in size by about 15% over the past 15 years.

(Click for larger view – data from Townes et al., APJ Lett 697 (2009) L127-L128)

The graph shows their data (note that the zero-line is suppressed, so the change appears bigger than it actually is), together with a best fit by a parabola in grey, and the Michelson & Pease result in orange. Michelson and Pease estimated that the actual diametre of Betelgeuse could be larger by 10%-15% because of systematic errors in their measurement method. I have added the line in magenta, which shows, for comparison, the radius of the orbit of Jupiter, using the latest Hipparcos/VLA parallax distance to Betelgeuse to convert angles in actual distances.

Betelgeuse has been known to be a star with variability, but it seems that this change in size is odd and unexpected, even more so as its luminosity has been roughly constant. It's fascinating to me that such a change can be measured. As the APJ Letter concludes:

ISI measurements over the last 15 years clearly show a systematic change in the diameter of α Ori. This change may or may not be periodic; if it is, the period is likely rather long, perhaps a few decades. [...] It should be valuable to continue accurate measurements of α Ori's size and other characteristics in order to understand the dynamics involved in this striking change, and to have systematic long-term measurements of similar stars.






Sunday, May 24, 2009

Experimental Interferometry, Continued

Last week, I did a little experiment in interferometry: I did mask the objective lens of my digital camera with a double-slit aperture, and photographed a scene with street lights at different distances. Far away lights showed a very nice interference pattern, as seen in this detail of the photo:



In the comments thread of the post, a question came up I hadn't thought about before: How comes that an interference pattern can be seen in the first place, given that the source of light looks white? After all, the broad spectrum of wavelengths from a white light should result in the superposition of the interference patterns for each wavelength, and a thus in a blurring of the fringes.

One reason for the appearance of the interference pattern is the spectrum of the street lights I had photographed: It is not a broad and continuous spectrum, but has a few bright lines. On the other hand, as I could convince myself, even for a broader spectrum, there is enough contrast between the main central spot and the satellite spots of the pattern to be clearly distinguishable.

When searching for information about the spectral features of typical street lights, I came across a great website, The CD-ROM Spectroscope, by astronomer Joachim Köppen. It explains, for example, how to see the spectra of street lamps using simply a CD-ROM. Actually, following the instructions on this site, I could check that the street lights are some variant of mercury vapour lamps - their spectrum looks pretty much like this photo taken from Joachim Köppen's site, with bright lines in the green, orange, and red:


Spectrum of a mercury vapour lamp as seen using a CD ROM as a diffraction grating; taken from: How to see the spectra of street lamps

I then set to figure out the diffraction pattern to be expected from the double-slit aperture in my experiment for light with different wavelengths. Actually, there is an analytical formula for the diffraction pattern of a double slit in the so-called far-field or Fraunhofer limit, i.e. for asymptotically large distances from the aperture. When a lens is used to map the interference pattern in the focal plane, as in my experiment with the camera, this limit is automatically reached. The interference pattern then only depends on the angle away from the optical axis. For two slits of width w a distance d apart, the intensity pattern for light with wavelength &lambda is described by the formula

where α is the angle away from the optical axis. The first fraction is the profile of the diffraction pattern for one slit, and the second fraction is the two-beam interference.

Actually, instead of using this formula, I found it quite instructive to play around with a small program to calculate the intensity pattern, by summing up the intensities of spherical waves emerging from the two slits, according to Huygens' principle. Thus, I calculated the intensity pattern for two slits w = 0.5 mm wide each with a separation of d = 1 mm, as seen on a screen in a distance of D = 10 m, and for different wavelengths. The result, which is pretty much the same as that from the analytical formula, is shown here:

(Click for larger view or the eps file)

The grey curve gives the sum of the intensities for the four different wavelengths. One sees that the pattern gets tighter for shorter wavelengths, and that, as a result, the satellite peaks are broadened. However, there is still enough contrast between the central maximum and the first pair of satellite peaks for the fringe pattern to be visible. All further peaks, on the other hand, will be washed out.

Now, to obtain the diffraction pattern of the street lights, one would have to sum up the diffraction patterns for different wavelengths, weighted with the spectral density of the mercury vapour lamp. There is enough contrast for the three fringes of the interference pattern to be distinguishable, and even for the solar spectrum, one could expect sufficient contrast to see interference.

One final question, however, remains: According to the plot of the diffraction pattern for different wavelengths, one could expect that the satellite peaks look coloured: more blueish on the side towards the inward peak, and more reddish on the outside. However, in the photo, above, there are no colours. How comes?

My guess is that this is due to the pixel resolution of my camera. Actually, what is recorded on the chip of the camera is the convolution of the diffraction pattern with the pixel characteristics of the CCD chip. One pixel of the photo corresponds to an angle of about 1/2 arc minute, and the peaks are about two arc minutes wide, corresponding to four pixels. This binning is too coarse to clearly distinguish colours, and hence, also the satellite peaks do look white.